Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2452 (DEL)

M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS v. RANJEET KUMAR GUPTA

W.P.(C)/9452/2024 · 2026-04-27

Sachin Datta

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 9347/2024 and connected matters $~57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 + W.P.(C) 9347/2024 and CM APPLs.38308/2024, 59535/2024, 5196/2026 (57) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus DHANRAJ KUMAR VERMA .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9444/2024 and CM APPLs.38750/2024, 59539/2024, 5195/2026 (58) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus SURENDER KUMAR .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9446/2024 and CM APPLs.38753/2024, 59433/2024, 5233/2026 (59) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus LAKHAN .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9448/2024 and CM APPLs.38755/2024, 59342/2024, 5502/2026 (60) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus VIJESHWAR PRASAD GUPTA .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9450/2024 and CM APPLs.38757/2024, 59534/2024, 5232/2026 (61) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus MOHAMMED SULTAN .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9451/2024 and CM APPLs.38759/2024, 59432/2024, 5194/2026 (62) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus Digitally Signed By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:29.04.2026 15:36:47 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 9347/2024 and connected matters ACHCHHELAL .....Respondent + W.P.(C) 9452/2024 and CM APPLs.38761/2024, 59343/2024 (63) M/S LUBANA OVERSEAS .....Petitioner versus RANJEET KUMAR GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Presence: Mr. Nihit Nagpal, Ms. Shuchita Chaubye, Ms. Bindra Rana and Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advs. for petitioner in item nos. 57 to 63. Mr. Ankit Dwivedi, Adv. for respondent workers (through v/c) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL) 1. A settlement is stated to have arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that necessary payments, due and payable to the respondents in terms of the settlement agreement has already been disbursed to them. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner confines to seeking that the amount initially deposited by the petitioner, as a pre-condition for grant of interim orders, may accordingly be released to the petitioner. The said prayer is allowed. 4. The petitions are disposed of in the above terms. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 27, 2026/cl By:ABHISHEK THAKUR Signing Date:29.04.2026 15:36:47