Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2406 (PAT)

Madan Ray @ Madan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/7157/2024 · 2026-08-20

Alok Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7157 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Madan Ray @ Madan Kumar Son of Suryadeo Ray Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 2. Mohan Ray @ Mohan Kumar Son of Suryadeo Ray, Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 3. Nand Kishore Ray Son of Suryadeo Ray, Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. 4. Sonu Kumar Son of Suryadeo Ray, Resident of Village- Basantpur Patti, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Principal Secretary, Rural Works Deptt. Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate -cum- Collector, District- Muzaffarpur. 4. Addl. Collector, District- Muzaffarpur. 5. Sub-Divisional Officer, Muzaffarpur, West, District- Muzaffarpur. 6. D.C.L.R, Muzaffarpur, West, District- Muzaffarpur. 7. Anchal Adhikari, Anchal Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajeshwar Singh, G.A-10 Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh, A.C to G.A-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 20-08-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing at length, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. 3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Patna High Court CWJC No.7157 of 2024(4) dt.20-08-2026 2/2 4. As such, the present writ petition stands disposed of, with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is directed that the learned lower Court/appropriate authority shall look into the issue of limitation afresh, taking into account the fact that the petitioner had approached this Hon’ble High Court by way of the instant writ petition. Bipin/- (Alok Kumar, J) U