CRM-M-55535- IN THE H (310) PARM PAL SING STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Ms. G Mr. S Mr. D Mr. B Respo MANISHA BATR 1. The p Nagarik Suraksha dated 17.08.2024 IPC added later Commissionerate, on the basis of com 2. This appear before the same could not be vide order dated 1 -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH SINGH AND OTHERS Versus
PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Ms. Geeta Dahiya, Advocate and Mr. SPS Tinna, Advocate for petition Mr. Durgesh Garg, AAG, Punjab Mr. B.R. Rana, Advocate for respond Respondent No.3 in person ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed u raksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) f .2024 registered under Sections 406 an later on) at Police Station Bha erate, Jalandhar and subsequent proc of compromise dated 19.09.2025 (Ann This Court vide order dated 30.09.20 re the trial Court to get their statem not be recorded due to some miscom ated 16.12.2025, this Court had direct JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-55535-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 12.02.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents ANISHA BATRA
etitioners spondent No.3 with filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya SS”) for quashing of FIR No.0076 406 and 420 of IPC (Section 201 of n Bhargo Camp, District Police nt proceedings emanating therefrom 5 (Annexure P-3).
.2025 had directed the parties to statements recorded. However, the iscommunication. Thereafter, again directed the parties to appear before M) 2026 s
s
atiya 76 1 of olice from es to , the gain efore AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-55535- the trial Court to directed to send hi 3. Pursu learned Chief Judi recorded. On the submitted report d effected between influence and as p the petitioners to respondent No.3 w by him. 4. Status counsel for respo between the partie 5. In vi continue with the p 6. Follo this Court in Kulw 2007 (3) RCR (Cr Gian Singh Versu is allowed and FIR 420 of IPC (Sectio District Police C -2025 (O&M) 2 urt to get their statements recorded end his report qua the genuineness of t Pursuant to the aforesaid order, part Judicial Magistrate, NRI Court, Jala n the basis of the statements so reco eport dated 02.02.2026 to the effect t tween the parties voluntarily and wi d as per the compromise an amount of ers to the respondent No.3. The said No.3 who is present in person Court t Status report has been filed. Learn respondent No.3 have not disputed parties. In view of the above, no useful th the proceedings before the trial Cou Following the principles laid down b Kulwinder Singh and others Versus (Criminal) 1052 and approved by ersus State of Punjab and others (2 nd FIR No.0076 dated 17.08.2024 reg (Section 201 of IPC added later on) at lice Commissionerate, Jalandhar a ded and the learned Magistrate was ess of the compromise. r, parties have appeared before the rt, Jalandhar and got their statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has ffect that the compromise has been nd without any coercion or undue unt of Rs.6 lakhs was to be given by e said amount has been given to the ourt today which has been accepted Learned State counsel as well as isputed the factum of compromise seful purpose would be served to al Court in the instant FIR. own by the Full Bench judgment of ersus State of Punjab and another ed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in rs (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition 24 registered under Sections 406 and on) at Police Station Bhargo Camp, har and subsequent proceedings was e the ents has been ndue n by o the pted ll as mise d to nt of her rt in tition and amp, ings AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-55535- emanating therefro P-3) are quashed q 12.02.2026 Amit Sharma


-2025 (O&M) 3 herefrom on the basis of compromise ashed qua the petitioners. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes 
 

romise dated 19.09.2025 (Annexure (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
Yes/No
xure AMIT SHARMA 2026.02.13 15:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.