IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6536 of 2024 ====================================================== 1. Ramesh Kumar S/o Late Ramnagina Rai, Resident of Mohalla-Baraiya, P.s.- Gopalpur, Distt-Patna. 2. Vijay Rai, S/o Late Devi Rai, Resident of Mohalla-Baraiya, P.s.-Gopalpur, Distt-Patna. 3. Aakash Kumar, S/o Late Lala Prasad, Resident of Mohalla-Baraiya, P.s.- Gopalpur, Distt-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Land Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna. 2. The District Magistrate, Patna. 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna. 5. The Circle Officer, Patna Sadar, Patna. 6. The S.H.O. Gopalpur Police Station, Patna. 7. Rita Kumar @ Rita Devi, Wife of Shashi Bhushan Prasad, R/o Vill-Gajendar Bigha, P.S. Hilsa, District-Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suraj Kumar Tiwari : Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Respondent/s : Dr.Md. Raisul Haque SC10 For respondent no. 7 : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar : Mr.Shyamal Prakash ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 13-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs :- “(i) For issuance of a writ for a direction to the respondents authorities to restrain the construction work of boundary wall by respondent no. 7 by which respondent no. 7 Patna High Court CWJC No.6536 of 2024(5) dt.13-08-2026 2/2 obstructing the common way (rasta) of petitioners which restricted the access of petitioners to their respective plots permanently. 2. For issuance of an appropriate writ for direction to respondent authorities to protect the common way (rasta) of petitioners for their access to their own plot. “ 3. After arguing at length, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. 4. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. 5. As such, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 6. It is directed that the lower court/ appropriate authority shall look into the issue of limitation afresh, taking into account the fact that the petitioner had approached the Hon’ble High Court by way of instant writ petition. rinkee/- (Alok Kumar, J) U