IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 CWP-22748-2024 Date of Decision : May 07, 2026 VIKAS -PETITIONER V/S STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, HARYANA AND OTHERS -RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Maloo Chahal, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the petitioner. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL) 1. Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 21.06.2023 passed by the State Information Commission, Haryana, on the solitary ground that there was perversity in the recording of facts to the effect that the entire information sought by the petitioner had been received by him. 2. This Court specifically queried learned counsel for the petitioner as to whether any application had been filed before the State Information Commission in this regard, to which she fairly conceded in the negative. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that the instant writ petition is not maintainable for the grievance raised. In the event of any grievance pertaining to the non-supply or inadequate supply of DEVINDER YADAV 2026.05.08 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-22748-2024 2 the information sought by him under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005, the petitioner ought to have approached the State Information Commission. 4. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) May 07, 2026 JUDGE devinder Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No DEVINDER YADAV 2026.05.08 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment