Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2396 (GAU)

MAFIR UDDIN AND 4 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/6624/2024 · 2026-09-13

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260472024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6624/2024 MAFIR UDDIN AND 4 ORS. S/O- ASMAT ALI, R/O- CHAKUMAKU, JAGIROAD, MORIGAON, CHAKUMAKU, MARIGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782410. 2: SADDAM HUSSAIN S/O- NABI HUSSAIN R/O- CHAKUMAKU MARIGAON DIST. MARIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782410. 3: JAHED ALI S/O- ABBAS ALI R/O- CHENIMARI KAKARJALA MARIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782410. 4: ATUL CH. BISWAS S/O- HASI RAM BISWAS R/O- NEAR MANDIR CHAKUMAKU JAGIROAD MAYONG MARIGAON ASSAM PIN- 782410. 5: HAMIDUL ISLAM S/O- AIB ALI R/O- VILL.- SIDHAGURI 1 NO. BURGAON DIST. MARIGAON ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN- 782411 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 3:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001. 4:DHRUBA RAJBANSHI RESIDENT OF BHETAPARA HOUSING COLONY GUWAHATI-781028 ASSAM 5:TGJ ENTERPRISE REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR DHRULAV CHANDRA DEKA SAWKUCHI GUWAHATI-781040. 6:DHANTI GOSWAMI M.G. TOWER 3RD FLOOR BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781028 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, MRS. R S DEURI,MR R ALI,MR D S DEKA,MS A DAS,MS. L WANGSA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, GMC Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 14.09.2026 Mr. U. Bharadwaj, learned counsel, appearing on instructions of Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel, for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners desire not to press the matter any further. Accordingly, he prays that, he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. Prayer accepted. In view of the above submission, made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant