Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2394 (GAU)

MD. RAFIQUL ISLAM AND 7 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/1348/2024 · 2026-09-13

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010048222024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1348/2024 MD. RAFIQUL ISLAM AND 7 ORS S/O- SAPOR UDDIN SK, VILLAGE- BHUTIADANG, P.O.- SWKCHAR, P.S.- SALMARA, DIST.- DHUBRI (ASSAM). 2: DERAJUDDIN AHMED S/O MD. TAHERUDDIN AHMED VILLAGE- CHARIA P.O.- PUBKALAKUCHI P.S.- MUKALMUA DIST.- NALBARI (ASSAM). 3: BAPUTI KALITA S/O- LATE GILIKA KALITA VILLAGE- 3 NO. BALITARA P.O.- BALITARA P.S.- GHARAPAR DIST.- NALBARI (ASSAM). 4: MD. MONIRUZZAMAN SK S/O- NURUL ISLAM SK VILLAGE- KANAIPARA P.S.- SOUTH SALMARA Page No.# 2/4 DIST.- DHUBRI (ASSAM). 5: SARIFUDDIN AHMED S/O- LATE ARMAN ALI VILLAGE- BAKULGURI P.O.- BARAPUTIA P.S.- KAMPUR DIST.- NAGAON (ASSAM). 6: SHAHJAN AHMED S/O- MAFIZ UDDIN AHMED VILLAGE- PHALIHAMARI PAM P.O.- PHALIHAMARI DISTRICT- MORIGAON (ASSAM). 7: MANTU RAM BORO S/O- MANGLU RAM BORO VILLAGE- BARFUL CHAKI P.O.- GORESWAR P.S.- GORESWAR DIST.- KAMRUP (ASSAM). 8: RUPASHREE BORA W/O- GARGA RAM BORAH VILLAGE- RANGMAHAL P.O.- RANGMAHAL P.S.- KAMRUP DIST.- KAMRUP (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS Page No.# 3/4 TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DIRECTOR ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19. 4:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM GUWAHATI Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA, S. M. ZINNA,MS S R MAZARBHUIYA,MS A BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR. S K MEDHI (R-4),SC, AG,SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 14.09. 2026 Heard Mr. A. M. Barbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. On the basis of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petitioner does not wish to press the petition any further. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty. Page No.# 4/4 Interim order(s), if any, stands vacated. Pending I.A(s), if any, are also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant