KASHMIRA TEHMURASP PATEL v. MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA)
WP/4197/2024 · 2026-08-31
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2391 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2391 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
69-WP-4197-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4197 OF 2024 Kashmira Tehmurasp Patel & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (MHADA) & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Sagar Batavia i/b Mr. Bommer Limbadri for the Petitioners. Mr. P.G.Lad a/w Ms. Sayali Apte & Mr. Muralidharan Kalathil for the Respondent - MHADA.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL JJ.
DATE : 31
st AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :
1. There are various reliefs sought by the petitioners in this petition. However, learned Counsel for the petitioners has argued today that they would be satisfied at this stage if the Representation dated 28th March, 2023 which they have made to the respondents, is decided expeditiously. The said Representation is at ‘Exhibit – U’ to this petition. Wakodikar 1/2 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.09.03 18:01:36 +0530
69-WP-4197-2024.doc
2.
Learned Counsel appearing for the MHADA states that the said Representation will be decided as per the policy.
3. In light of the fair submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing for MHADA, we direct the MHADA to decide the Representation made by the petitioners on 28th March, 2023, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from today.
4. Needless to state that we have not considered the case of the petitioners on merits. All contentions of all parties are kept open.
5. The petitioners are at liberty to file an appropriate proceeding in case they are not satisfied with the decision on the Representation by the respondents.
6. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) Wakodikar 2/2