Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2373 (PNJ)

KARNAIL SINGH v. CHARAN SINGH AND ANOTHER

CR/3023/2024 · 2026-04-23

Nidhi Gupta

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 120+255 Karnail Si Charan Si CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU CM-25894 record the affidavits, e 14 to P-16. accepts not Civil Revision No.3023 of 2024 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Misc. No.25 Civil Revision N Date of decision Singh …..Ap Versus ran Singh and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Nischal Chetanya Mancha Mr. Saksham, Advocate Mr. Devyansh Arora and Mr. Jatin Sardana, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner. Mr. M.L. Saggar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Omesh Garg, Advocate fo 1(ii). None for respondent No.2. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 25894-CII-2025 The present application has rd the Compromise/Panchayati decisi avits, evidencing settlement between t 16. Notice of the application. Learned counsel for the resp pts notice and does not oppose the pray O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH . No.25894-CII-2025 in/and ion No.3023 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-23.04.2026 Applicant-Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA anchanda, Advocate with cate vocate with cate for respondents No.1(i) and has been filed for placing on decision along with supporting ween the parties, as Annexures P- e respondents No.1(i) and 1(ii) he prayer made in the application. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document fact that th proper adju subject to along with Civil Revis 227 of the dated 05.0 Civil Judg application seeking en (Annexure respondent that during have am compromis today as An 2025. On petitioner s 1(ii) affirm prayer mad Civil Revision No.3023 of 2024 (O & In view of the averments mad that the documents sought to be placed er adjudication of the present case, t ct to all just exceptions. The Compr with affidavits are taken on record as l Revision No.3023 of 2024 (O & M) The present revision petition h the Constitution of India for setting 05.01.2024 (Annexure P-8) passed Judge (Senior Division), Sri Anan cation filed by the petitioner under ing enforcement of judgment and exure P-2), including a prayer for ndents for alleged disobedience, has b At the outset, learned counsel during the pendency of the present re amicably resolved their dis romise/panchayati decision, which h y as Annexures P-14 to P-16 vide orde . On the basis of the said settlemen ioner seeks permission to withdraw the Learned Senior Counsel for th affirms the factum of compromise an er made by learned counsel for the peti O & M) 2 s made in the application and the placed on record are material for case, the application is allowed, Compromise/Panchayati decision ord as Annexures P-14 to P-16. & M) tition has been filed under Article setting aside the impugned order assed by the learned Additional Anandpur Sahib, whereby the under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC and decree dated 25.05.2010 r for civil imprisonment of the , has been dismissed. ounsel for the petitioner submits sent revision petition, the parties dispute by way of a hich has been placed on record e order passed in CM-25894-CII- tlement, learned counsel for the aw the present revision petition. l for the respondents No.1(i) and ise and raises no objection to the he petitioner. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the parties parties and duly taken the present dismissed the parties. by the term 16), and sh of. April 23, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo Civil Revision No.3023 of 2024 (O & It is confirmed by learned cou arties to the petition are part of the said In view of the statement made es and the compromise arrived at betw taken on record, no useful purpose w resent revision petition pending. Accordingly, the present c issed as withdrawn in view of the com arties. However, it is clarified that the e terms and conditions of the comprom and shall strictly adhere to the same. Pending application(s), if any , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No O & M) 3 ed counsel for the parties that all the said Compromise. t made by learned counsel for the between them, which has been ose would be served by keeping ent civil revision petition is the compromise effected between hat the parties shall remain bound mpromise (Annexures P-14 to P- if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document