Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2358 (PNJ)

ATUL KUMAR JAIN AND OTHERS v. MOHAMMAD SHAYIN AND ANOTHER

COCP/647/2024 · 2026-03-12

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN T 208 Atul Kuma Mohamma and anothe CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU order dated Court in LP Kumar and COCP-647-2024 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.647 of Date of decision : Kumar Jain and others Versus mmad Shayin, M.D. HPGCL, Urja B nother AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Vishal Satija, Advocate with Mr. Rajneesh Mudhiraja, Advoc for the petitioners. Mr. Puneet Jindal, Sr. Advocate Ms. Fiza Arora, Advocate for the I GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition has be dated 09.8.2018 (Annexure P-1) passed in LPA-958-2016 titled as “Ranbir Si r and others”, whereby it was ordered as “i) For the purpose promotion to the post o amended Regulation 9 Electricity Board Serv Recruitment Regulation Haryana State Electricit has to be counted from Subordinate acquires A.M ii) The ranking list year as on 1st January of 2 of Guidelines dated 20. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 47 of 2024 (O & M) sion :-12.03.2026 …..Petitioners rja Bhawan, Sector 6, Panchkula …..Respondents NIDHI GUPTA te with Advocate ocate with for the respondents. has been filed alleging violation of passed by a Division Bench of this bir Singh and others vs. Gulshan red as follows :- rpose of accelerated 12 ½% st of Assistant Engineer as per n 9(1)(b)(ii) of Punjab State Service of Engineers (Civil) tions, 1965, as applicable to tricity Board, service of 5 years rom the date when Engineering s A.M.LE/B.E. Qualification. list shall be prepared for every y of every year in terms of clause 20.10.1993 (Annexure P6). VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 19.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioners t 958-2016 ha to the petit counsel for dismissed, available to March 12, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep COCP-647-2024 (O & M) iii) The promotions accordance with the said iv) The department sh months from the date of the order and the follow undoing the wrong pro promotions in terms of fin v) Order dated 16.3 by Single Bench are 22.7.2015 is upheld with vi) All the contrar instructions so far as co quashed.” At the very outset, it is submitte oners that the Division Bench order date 016 has been complied with. It is subm petitioners have not been granted to el for the petitioners prays that the pres ssed, however, with liberty to the p ble to them, as per law. Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 ns shall be made strictly in said ranking list. nt shall prepare such list within 3 e of receipt of a certified copy of llow up action shall be taken by promotions made and making of finding recorded above. 16.3.2016 and 30.5.2016 passed re set aside and order dated ith above noted modifications. ntrary orders, guidelines or s contrary to this judgment are bmitted by learned counsel for the er dated 09.8.2018 passed in LPA- s submitted that all the benefits due ed to them. Accordingly, learned e present contempt petition may be the petitioners to seek remedies ny, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.13 19.40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document