5-IA-9669-24 IN AO.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9669 OF 2024 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 468 OF 2024 Sandeep Surendra Anand ... Appellant Versus Satish Laxminarayan Garg And Others ...Respondents _______ Mr. Nishchal S. Anand, for Appellant. Mr. Shubham S. Saraf a/w. Mr. Tanmay A. Deshmukh i/b. Mr. Pavan S. Patil, for Respondent. _______ CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J. DATE: 31 AUGUST 2026 P.C. 1. This Appeal from Order challenges the order passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, in Special Suit No. 1957 of 2021, whereby the Appellant sought reliefs of specific performance, declaration, permanent injunction and, in the alternative, compensation. 2. Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are present. By consent, they seek disposal of the aforesaid Appeal in view of the statement made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, under instructions, that Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 shall not create any third-party rights in respect of the suit property, to the extent of the share claimed by the Appellant under the Agreements dated 03 June 2014 and 25 November 2019. Mane JYOTI RAJESH MANE Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2026.09.01 15:26:09 +0530 5-IA-9669-24 IN AO.DOC 3. In view of the aforesaid statement and undertaking, the learned Trial Court is requested to expeditiously decide the suit on its own merits and in accordance with law. 4. Appeal from order stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (AARTI SATHE, J.) Mane