is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 12.04.2024, registered under Section Rampura, District Bathinda. 2. custody for the present case on account of and the complainant, who has now turned hostile together. Charges were framed on 06.08.2024, 3 witnesses, including the complainant, stand examined but there are still 13 more to go. petitioner is not involved in any other case. 3. State counsel bars for 1 year, 9 months and 4 days. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 12.04.2024, registered under Section 307 IPC, at Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda. Learned counsel contends that 1 year, 9 months and 4 days. He has been falsely implicated in the present case on account of matrimonial and the complainant, who has now turned hostile Charges were framed on 06.08.2024, 3 witnesses, including the complainant, stand examined but there are still 13 more to go. petitioner is not involved in any other case. The custody certificate dated 19.01.2026 State counsel is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind 1 year, 9 months and 4 days. n the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.35 dated 307 IPC, at Police Station City Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in He has been falsely implicated in matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the complainant, who has now turned hostile and they are living Charges were framed on 06.08.2024, 3 witnesses, including the complainant, stand examined but there are still 13 more to go. The petitioner is not involved in any other case. 19.01.2026, filed by the learned is taken on record. As per the same, the petitioner is behind n the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the bail on the ground that there are specific allegations against the petitioner of having caused injuries on the head and elbow of the complainant and recovery of khapa has been effected from him. However, he is unable to controvert the submissions with regard to stage of the case and the petitioner being not involved in any other case. 5. Heard. 6. 06.08.2024, however, out of 16 PWs, 3 witnesses including the complainant have been examined; 7. The petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, if not required in any other case and shall abide by the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The petitioner will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The petitioner will appear before the trial Court on each and every date fixed, unless is exempted by a specific order of Court. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. (iv) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which, he is an accused, or for commission of which he is suspected of. (v) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly coerce, induce, threaten or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/ her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence in any manner. (vi) The petitioner shall not in any manner misuse his liberty. (vii) The petitioner shall furnish his address and mobile number by way of an affidavit to the trial Court and not change the same till conclusion of trial and if for any reasons, he seeks to change either of the aforesaid, it shall be done only with prior information to the learned trial Court. (viii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the trial Court. (ix) The trial Court/Duty Magistrate may impose any other condition, as deemed appropriate while releasing the petitioner. 8. It is made abundantly clear that in case there is any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the State shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail as granted to the petitioner by this order. 9. In view of the above, it is clarified that the observations made herein above are limited for the purpose of present proceedings and would not be construed as any opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently of the aforesaid observations. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.20 19:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.