Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2344 (BOM)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR v. NILESH KAUTIK SHIRSAT

IA/12244/2024 · 2026-09-01

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

87-IA-12244-2024.doc Sayali IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12244 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32628 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12245 OF 2024 The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector … Applicant V/s. Nilesh Kautik Shirsat … Respondent Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional GP, for Appellant. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 P.C.: INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12244 OF 2024 1. For the reasons stated in the paragraph nos. 3 to 5, the delay in filing appeal is condoned. 2. The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘b’. 3. The application stands disposed off. FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 32628 OF 2022 4. Admit. 5. Paper book is to be filed within one year. 1 SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Digitally signed by SAYALI DEEPAK UPASANI Date: 2026.09.02 11:29:03 +0530 87-IA-12244-2024.doc INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12245 OF 2024 6. For the reasons stated therein, the interim application is allowed. There shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b), subject to the condition that the appellant shall, within period of eight weeks from today, deposit entire decretal amount along with accrued interest with the Reference Court. 7. The interim application stands disposed of. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 2