Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040003842024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/50/2024 Tashi Pajing Son of Late Takak Pajing, permanent resident of Lokpeng Village, PO Panging, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 9 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 2:THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAND Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT.OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH CIVIL SECRETARIAT ITANAGAR P.O- ITANAGAR 791111 3:THE COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY Age: 0 Occupation : PWD-CUM CHAIRMAN TRANS-ARUNACHAL HIGHWAY (TAH) GOVT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH CIVIL SECRETARIAT ITANAGAR 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Age: 0 Occupation : DISTRICT SIANG BOLENG PO - BOLENG ARUNACHAL PRADESH 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER Age: 0 Page No.# 2/4 Occupation : DISTRICT EAST SIANG PASIGHAT P.O- PASIGHAT ARUNACHAL PRADESH 6:THE DIRECTOR OF LAND MANAGEMENT Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH ITANAGAR 7:THE CHIEF ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : PWD EASTERN ZONE TRANS-ARUNACHAL HIGHWAY MOB-II GOVT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH MOWB -II PO ITANAGAR 8:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : PWD DIVISION (TAH) BASAR PO BASAR LEPARADA DISTRICT ARUNACHAL PRADESH 9:THE DISTRICT LAND REVENUE AND SETTLEMENT OFFICE Age: 0 Occupation : DISTRICT-SIANG BOLENG PO BOLENG ARUNACHAL PRADESH 10:THE DISTRICT LAND REVENUE AND SETTLEMENT OFFICER Age: 0 Occupation : DISTRICT-EAST SIANG P.O- PASIGHAT ARUNACHAL PRADES Advocate for the Petitioner : Tayum Son, P Nabam Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), Radhe Millo,S/C (High Way) Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 13-08-2026 Heard Mr. T. Son, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. K. Wangmo, learned Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 and Mr. R. Milo, learned standing counsel, PWD (HW) appearing for the respondent Nos. 3, 7 and 8. The present interlocutory application has been instituted praying for condonation of delay of 566 days in preferring the connected review petition. A perusal of the contention raised in the present interlocutory application towards justifying the delay occasioned in the matter, although the explanation is found to be scratchy, the petitioner has projected that he was incapacitated on account of certain psychological issues, which has prevented him from instituting the connected review petition in time. It is also noticed by this Court that earlier, the review petition was listed, but the same was withdrawn with liberty to file afresh along with the condonation of delay petition. Although, the learned counsel for the respondents have vehemently objected to the condonation of delay, however, this Court finds that the issue raised would be mandated to be considered on merit and accordingly, the delay in preferring the connected review petition stands condoned. Page No.# 4/4 Interlocutory application stands disposed of. Registry to list the connected review petition being Review Petition No. 05/2024 after 04 weeks. JUDGE Comparing Assistant