CRM-M-69809- 244 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Gurdeep Singh State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MS Present: Mr. D.S.Matya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG Haryana. MANDEEP PANNU J. 1. The present petition has been filed praying for impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, in case titled State versus Gurdeep Singh arising out of FIR No. 279 dated 13.06.2017 registered at Police Station Ambala City, District Ambala under Sections 120-B and 409 IPC, pending before the Court of learned CJM, Ambala. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that an application moved on behalf of the prosecution seeking permission for further investigation of the case was allowed and the pet 2. In the present case, a report was called for from the concerned Court. The learned trial Court, in its report dated 29.01.2026, has submitted that vide order dated 18.04.2024, the application seeking permiss the matter was allowed and since then the case had been fixed for awaiting report -2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM Date of Decision VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. D.S.Matya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG Haryana. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed praying for impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, in case titled State versus Gurdeep Singh arising out of FIR No. 279 dated 13.06.2017 registered at Police Station Ambala City, District Ambala under B and 409 IPC, pending before the Court of learned CJM, Ambala. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that an application moved on behalf of the prosecution seeking permission for further investigation of the case was allowed and the petitioner has challenged the above In the present case, a report was called for from the concerned Court. The learned trial Court, in its report dated 29.01.2026, has submitted that vide order dated 18.04.2024, the application seeking permiss the matter was allowed and since then the case had been fixed for awaiting report -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-69809-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 13.02.2026 ....Petitioner ....Respondent MANDEEP PANNU. Mr. D.S.Matya, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, AAG Haryana. The present petition has been filed praying for quashing of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, in case titled State versus Gurdeep Singh arising out of FIR No. 279 dated 13.06.2017 registered at Police Station Ambala City, District Ambala under B and 409 IPC, pending before the Court of learned CJM, Ambala. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that an application moved on behalf of the prosecution seeking permission for further investigation of the case was itioner has challenged the above-said order. In the present case, a report was called for from the concerned Court. The learned trial Court, in its report dated 29.01.2026, has submitted that vide order dated 18.04.2024, the application seeking permission to further investigate the matter was allowed and since then the case had been fixed for awaiting report quashing of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambala, in case titled State versus Gurdeep Singh arising out of FIR No. 279 dated 13.06.2017 registered at Police Station Ambala City, District Ambala under B and 409 IPC, pending before the Court of learned CJM, Ambala. A perusal of the impugned order would reveal that an application moved on behalf of the prosecution seeking permission for further investigation of the case was In the present case, a report was called for from the concerned Court. The learned trial Court, in its report dated 29.01.2026, has submitted that vide ion to further investigate the matter was allowed and since then the case had been fixed for awaiting report TRIPTI SAINI 2026.02.17 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-69809- from the prosecution. It has further been reported that the said report has now been submitted by the Investigating Officer. 3. Since the report p been submitted by the Investigating Officer, the present petition seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 stands disposed of, having been rendered infructuous. 4. All pending miscellaneous February 13, 202 tripti Whether speaking/non Whether reportable -2025 (O&M) from the prosecution. It has further been reported that the said report has now been submitted by the Investigating Officer. Since the report pursuant to the order dated 18.04.2024 has already been submitted by the Investigating Officer, the present petition seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 stands disposed of, having been rendered All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No -2- from the prosecution. It has further been reported that the said report has now been ursuant to the order dated 18.04.2024 has already been submitted by the Investigating Officer, the present petition seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 stands disposed of, having been rendered application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE : Speaking : Yes/No from the prosecution. It has further been reported that the said report has now been ursuant to the order dated 18.04.2024 has already been submitted by the Investigating Officer, the present petition seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 stands disposed of, having been rendered application(s), if any, stands disposed of. TRIPTI SAINI 2026.02.17 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document