Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2304 (GAU)

GO-002092W RAM MILAN v. GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND 2 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/524/2024 · 2026-07-26

Kaushik Goswami

Contempt Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010203722024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/524/2024 GO-002092W RAM MILAN S/O- LATE GHINAHOO YADAV, R/O- FLAT NO. A3/529, HIMSAGAR APARTMENTS, BUILDERS AREA, POCKET-IV, GREATER NOIDA, DIST. GAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR, UTTAR PRADESH, PIN- 201310, PRESENTLY SERVING AS SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (CIVIL) AND STATIONED AT HQ ADDL. DGBR (NW), SECTOR 48-C, CHANDIGARH, PIN- 160047. VERSUS GIRIDHAR ARAMANE AND 2 ORS. DEFENCE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, 101-A, SOUTH BLOCK,NEW DELHI-110011. 2:MAYANK TEWARI JOINT SECRETARY BORDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT BOARD (BRDB) (NOW RE-DESIGNATED AS JOINT SECRETARY MOD (BORDER ROADS) MINISTRY OF DEFENCE 198-B SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110011. 3:(LT GEN) RAGHU SRINIVASAN DIRECTOR GENERAL BORDER ROADS ORGANIZATION SEEMA SADAK BHAWAN RING ROAD DELHI CANTT NEW DELHI-110010 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R BORAH, MR. D BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S S ROY (R-3), Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 27.07.2026 Heard Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. S. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent(s)/contemnor(s) on call. It is submitted by Mr. D. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioner that the order of this Court, which is being assailed to have not been complied with in the present contempt proceeding, is in the meantime duly complied with by the respondent authorities. He accordingly submits that the order of this Court dated 29.02.2024 having been complied with, nothing survives for adjudication in the present contempt proceedings. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt petition stands closed. The notice issued to the alleged contemnor(s) stands discharged. JUDGE Comparing Assistant