Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2298 (BOM)

SANGITA RAJU CHANGAUDAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/5172/2024 · 2026-08-29

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

38-WP-5172-2024 (CR).doc IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5172 OF 2024 Sangita Raju Changaudar ..… Petitioner VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Anr ..… Respondents ... Mr. Pratik Patil i/by Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for Respondent No. 1-State. ... CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : 29 AUGUST 2026. P. C. : 1. Learned APP submits that the charges have already been framed. Therefore, the present Petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the Petition stands disposed of as infructuous. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Shubham 1 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Digitally signed by TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2026.08.31 11:36:48 +0530