Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2290 (PAT)

Smita Kumari v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./29397/2024 · 2026-07-24

Sandeep Kumar

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29397 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Smita Kumari W/o Prayag Raj, D/o Ravindra Pandit R/o vill - Silao, P.O and P.S. - Silao, Distt. - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Prayag Raj S/o Late Rajendra Pandit R/o vill - Banjariya, babu tola, ward no. 08, P.s. - Banjatiya, Distt. - East Chamapran, At present R/o Shivajee Chowk, Raj Footware, New Jaganpura, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Distt. - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nityanand Neeraj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the O.P. No. 2 vide order dated 07.12.2023 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 70786 of 2023. 3. Perused the records. 4. Having considered the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. No. 2 has misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29397 of 2024(6) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order. 5. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed. 6. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nalanda through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance. sadique/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T