SANJAY HIMMAT PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
WP/1794/2024 · 2026-08-25
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2282 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2282 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
5-sr905.wp1794.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 WRIT PETITION NO. 1794 OF 2024 Sanjay Himmat Patil VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ---- Mr.Viraj S Yelmame h/f. Mr.M.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for Advocate for petitioner Mr.K.B.Jadhavar, AGP for respondent nos.1 and 2 Mr.A.A.Fulfagar, Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 6 ----
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : AUGUST 25, 2026
ORDER :-
It is submitted across the bar by learned advocate for the respondent nos.4 to 6 that the term of the local body is over. He submits that the petitioner is the complainant who has sought disqualification of the respondent nos.4 to 6 on account of alleged encroachment. The authorities have held that there is no encroachment.
2. In view of the above statement, nothing survives in the Writ Petition. The petition stands disposed of.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ………..
KBP