CRR-1351-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 CRR-1351-2024 Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 REWATI DEVI ......... Pe oner Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS ......... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present None for the pe oner. Mr. Shiva Khurmi, D.A.G., Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. (ORAL) FIR No. Dated Police Sta0on Sec0ons 158 24.04.2021 City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh 148, 149, 323, 325, 435, 506 IPC 1. The present pe on has been filed challenging the impugned judgment dated 18.03.2024 passed by the learned Addi onal Sessions Judge, Narnaul, whereby the appeal preferred by the pe oner against the judgment dated 15.03.2017 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Narnaul, was dismissed and respondents No. 2 to 4 were acqui=ed in the aforesaid FIR. 2. On the last date of hearing, none had appeared on behalf of the pe oner. Even today, none has appeared on her behalf. It appears the pe oner is no more interested to pursue the present pe on. 3. Given above, the present pe on stands dismissed for non-prosecu on. It is clarified that the Registry shall not entertain any applica on for restora on to the main pe on. However, liberty is reserved to the pe oner to file a fresh pe on, in case need arises. It is further clarified that the me for which the present pe on is pending before this Court shall not be counted for the purpose of limita on and the limita on will start from tomorrow, which shall have to be explained. All pending miscellaneous applica ons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 02.04.2026 Jyo -II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2026.04.06 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.