Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2275 (BOM)

SHRI PRAVIN BIRU SHISTE v. SHRI ASHOK APANNA SHISHTE

REVN/450/2024 · 2026-08-27

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

501-cra-450-2024.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.450 OF 2024 Shri Pravin Biru Shiste ...Applicant Versus Shri. Ashok Apanna Shishte & Anr ...Respondents —————— Mr. Prathamesh Patil a/w. Ms. Manjusha Bhosale i/b. P. Padmanabh Associates, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Ajay Rajenimbalkar i/b. Ms. Mrinal Shelar, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Avinash A. Naik, APP for the Respondents State. —————— Coram : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. Date : AUGUST 27, 2026. P. C. : 1. Not on Board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. The applicant as well as the respondents have entered into consent terms dated 21 August 2026. The consent terms signed by the parties are taken on record and marked “X” for identification. 3. Mr. Prathamesh Patil and Mr. Ajay Rajenimbalkar, learned Advocates for the respective parties, state that their respective clients have signed the consent terms in their presence and they identify their signatures. They further state that they have explained the contents of adn 1 of 4 501-cra-450-2024.docx the consent terms to the signatories and that the signatories have signed the same after understanding the contents thereof. For ease of reference, the consent terms are scanned and reproduced hereinbelow:— adn 2 of 4 501-cra-450-2024.docx adn 3 of 4 501-cra-450-2024.docx 4. The submissions made in the consent terms are accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. All undertakings are also accepted. 5. The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of the consent terms dated 21 August 2026. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) adn 4 of 4