Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2267 (GAU)

JOY PRAKASH MACHAHARY v. CHANDAN SHARMA

Cont.Cas(C)/390/2024 · 2026-06-24

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010257232025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/390/2024 JOY PRAKASH MACHAHARY S/O SRI BINOD BHUSHAN MACHAHARY R/O VILL-GWJWNPURI WARD NO. 4 P.O.-CHAPAGURI P.S.-DHALIGAON DIST-CHIRANG (BTAD) ASSAM VERSUS CHANDAN SHARMA THE COMMISSIONER AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. ------------ Advocate for : MR. D P BORAH Advocate for : MR. D NATH appearing for CHANDAN SHARMA Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 25.06 .2026 Heard Mr. D.P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate for the respondents. 2] In deference to the direction passed in WP(C) No.7193/2023 by order dated 15.12.2023 the respondent authorities are finally issued an order for promotion of the petitioner to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer (C) in Scale of Pay band-4 Pay of Rs.30,000/- to Rs.1,10,000/-. 3] A copy of the order dated 24.06.2026 has been placed before this Court by Mr. D. Nath, learned Senior Government Advocate, which is kept tagged in the case record. 4] The submissions are not disputed by Mr. D.P. Borah, learned counsel for he petitioner and he submits that the position is correct on facts. 5] In that view of the matter, this Court does not wish to proceed any further in the contempt petition. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition being Cont.Cas(C) No.390/2024 stands closed. 6] Notices issued, if any stand recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant