IN TH 215 (3 cases) 1. Tara Chan Manisha a 2. Tara Chan Deepak an 3. Tara Chan Daksh Ra Smt. Mani CORAM: Present:- FAO Nos.197, 209 and 249 of 2024 ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR cases) FAO No.197 of 2 Date of decision Chand Versus isha and others FAO No.209 of 2 Chand Versus ak and others FAO No.249 of 2 Chand Versus h Rathee (minor) through his mot Manisha and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Dheeraj Narula, Advocate for the appellant(s). Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.1 in all case 24 (O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 97 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-24.04.2026 …..Appellant …..Respondents 09 of 2024 (O & M) …..Appellant …..Respondents 49 of 2024 (O & M) …..Appellant is mother and naturl guardian …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate ocate ll cases. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.28 12.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document NIDHI GU Award dat Claims Tri vide this co offending v the appella as the exec satisfied in awarded b appellant(s copies of th Execution etc.”, Exec deep etc.”; Rathee vs. which are t facts to be disposed o FAO Nos.197, 209 and 249 of 2024 ( HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Since all the aforesaid appea rd dated 01.09.2023 passed by the s Tribunal, Sonipat, the same are bei this common order are being disposed The present appeals have been ding vehicle. At the very outset, it is submi ppellant that all the three appeals have e execution petitions pending before t fied in all the three cases as paym ded by the learned Tribunal have llant(s) to the respondent/claimant in es of the orders of the Executing Cour ution Petition No.66 of 2024 titled as , Execution Petition No.67 of 2024 tit etc.”; and Execution Petition No.68 ee vs. Gagan Deep etc.” have been h are taken on record. Learned counsel for respond to be true. Heard. In view of the above noted fa osed of as having been rendered infruc Pending application(s), if any, 24 (O & M) 2 appeals arising out of the same y the learned Motor Accident are being taken up altogether and posed of. e been filed by the owner of the submitted by learned counsel for ls have been rendered infructuous efore the Executing Court stands payment of the compensation l have been disbursed by the ant in all the three cases. The Court dated 02.8.2025 passed in tled as “Deepak vs. Gagan Deep 024 titled as “Manisha vs. Gagan No.68 of 2024 titled as “Daksh been handed over in the Court, espondent No.1 admits the said ted facts, the present appeals are infructuous. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.28 12.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document appellant, appeals, be connected m April 24, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo FAO Nos.197, 209 and 249 of 2024 ( However, on oral prayer made llant, the statutory amount deposited als, be released to him, as per rules. Photocopy of this order be ected matter(s). , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 24 (O & M) 3 r made by learned counsel for the osited by the appellant in each er be placed in the file(s) of ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.28 12.25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document