MAHENDER AND ORS v. ANAND MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND ORS
COCP/3552/2024 · 2026-03-10
Sudeepti Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2256 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2256 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.3552 of 202
IN TH 300
MAHENDER AN
Vs ANAND MOHAN
CORAM: HON'
Present:
Mr. V
Mr. R
Mr. A
HARKESH MAN
1.
Lear
order dated 05.12 whereby the petit Group-D (Sharmi
2.
Lear regular appointme of diminishing c including the arre today.
3.
In vi counsel for the pe
4.
Dism
5.
It is aforementioned p to seek revival of officer would be pocket in favour the first date of lis
December 13, 20 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.
Date of De R AND ORS
OHAN SHARAN IAS AND ORS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Vikas Sonak, Advocate and Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocate for the Mr. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Haryan
**** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel representing 05.12.2024 passed by the Deputy C petitioners have been found entitled harmik) w.e.f. 01.10.2003 Learned State counsel further on in ointment in this regard shall be issued hing cadre post(s) along with relea he arrears of regular pay as well wit In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioners does not press the prese Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand It is also made clear that in case th ned period, as per the undertaking, ival of contempt petition and in that ld be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50 avour of the petitionerstowards litigati e of listing of revival application.
(HA , 2024
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.3552 of 2024 (O&M)
of Decision: 13.12.2024
......Petitioners
....Respondents ESH MANUJA for the petitioners. aryana. enting the respondents refers to offic puty Conservator of Forests, Panipta ntitled for regularization on the post o on instructions submits that letter o issued to the petitioners upon creatio release of all consequential benefi within a period of four weeks fro ertaking by the respondent(s), learne e present petition. stands discharged. ase the needful is not done within th ing, the petitioners would be at liber n that eventuality, the erring/concerne 50,000/- as cost(s) from his/her ow litigation expenses, immediately i.e. o (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE 1
ffice aniptat, post of letter of creation benefits ks from learned thin the t liberty ncerned her own y i.e. on MOHMED ATIK 2024.12.16 10:33 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment