VAIBHAO PRATAP SINGH@ PRINCE v. SHUBHAM KUMAR & ORS.
RFA(COMM)/322/2024 · 2026-01-30
Amit Mahajan, Anil Kshetarpal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2255 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2255 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(COMM) 322/2024 & CM APPL. 45851/2024 VAIBHAO PRATAP SINGH@ PRINCE.....APPELLANT Through: Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Adv. along with Appellant in person Mr. Karan Valecha, Adv. versus SHUBHAM KUMAR & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Raj Gaurav and Mr Mukul Seth, Advs. for R-1. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R %
30.01.2026
1. On 10.11.2025, the parties entered into settlement with the intervention of Samadhan, whereunder the Appellant agreed to pay the settled amount of ₹5,55,000/- by way of RTGS/NEFT/online bank transfer in the following manner : a) A sum of ₹1,50,000/- at the time of signing of the Settlement Agreement vide Cheque No. 000054 dated 10.11.2025 drawn on HDFC Bank, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow Branch b) A sum of ₹1,35,000/- on 15.11.2025 c) A sum of ₹1,35,000/- on 14.12.2025 d) A sum of ₹1,35,000/- on 14.01.2026
2. Undisputedly, an amount of ₹1,50,000/- has already been paid by the Appellant. Today, the Appellant has handed over an amount of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:13:59
₹1,35,000/- in the form of two cheques in Court.
3. The Appellant undertakes to pay the remaining amount as early as possible but latest by 31.03.2026.
4. The learned counsel representing the Respondent No.1 has no objection if the present case is disposed of in view of the undertaking tendered by the Appellant.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present appeal along with the pending application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
6. It is however made clear that the Appellant shall remain bound by his undertaking.
7. The Respondent No.1 is at liberty to file an application for revival in case of any further default on part of the Appellant.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J AMIT MAHAJAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 ‘KDK’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 12:13:59