NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. RIMJIM DAS @ RIMJIM DAS KUMAR AND 4 ORS.
I.A.(Civil)/453/2024 · 2026-06-16
Yarenjungla Longkumer
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2246 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2246 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010028342024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/453/2024 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NEW ASSURANCE BUILDING 87, MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD, MUMBAI, AND AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICES AT AT STAR CITY COMPLEX, 5TH FLOOR, LACHIT NAGAR, GUWAHATI- 781005, NEAR HANUMAN MANDIR. VERSUS RIMJIM DAS @ RIMJIM DAS KUMAR AND 4 ORS.
W/O LATE MUKUT KUMAR, VILL.- KHEHENIPARA, P.O.- BEZERA, P.S.- BAIHATA CHAAARIALI, PIN- 781121, DIST.- KAMRUP (R), ASSAM.
2:RAGIN KUMAR S/O LATE MUKUT KUMAR
VILL.- KHEHENIPARA P.O.- BEZERA P.S.- BAIHATA CHAAARIALI PIN- 781121 DIST.- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM.
3:BATEHI KUMAR LATE MUKUT KUMAR
VILL.- KHEHENIPARA P.O.- BEZERA P.S.- BAIHATA CHAAARIALI PIN- 781121 DIST.- KAMRUP (R) ASSAM.
Page No.# 2/4 4:MD FIRUZOR RAHMAN S/O FAIZUR RAHMAN
VILL.- CHECHAMUKH P.O.- KULHATI P.S.- HAJO DIST.- KAMRUP (R) PIN- 781104.
5:MD ATIKUR RAHMAN S/O LATE HASMAT ALI
VILL.- GUWAKUCHI P.S.- GHAGRAPAR DIST.- NALBARI PIN- 781369 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA, MRS L SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. N I CHOUDHURY (R-1,3,2), Linked Case :
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD VERSUS RIMJIM DAS @ RIMJIM DAS KUMAR AND 4 ORS. F ------------ Advocate for : MR. K K BHATTA Advocate for : appearing for RIMJIM DAS @ RIMJIM DAS KUMAR AND 4 ORS. F
Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
ORDER 17/06/2026
Learned counsel, Mr. K.K. Bhatta is present for the applicant.
Learned counsel, Mr. A.N. Jabel enters appearance for the claimants/respondent Nos. 1,2&3.
2. The instant application under Section 5 of the limitation Act has been filed praying for condonation of delay of 2(two) days in filing the connected appeal against the impugned award dated 13.09.2026 passed by the learned MACT No.3, Kamrup in MAC Case No.2601/2018.
3. The reasons for the delay has been explained in the application and this Court finds that sufficient cause has been shown. The learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1,2 &3 has also not raised any objection regarding the delay.
4. In view of the above facts and circumstances, the delay of 2(two) days in filing the connected MACT No.3, Kamrup in MAC Case No.2601/2018 is condoned and the application stands allowed.
5. The Registry is directed to register the main appeal and list the same for admission after the summer vacation. JUDGE
Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant