Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2234 (BOM)

MR GAJANAN SUKUR PATIL SINCE DECD THROUGH LRS SUREKHA GAJANAN PATIL AND ORS v. MR DATTATRAY SUKUR PATIL SINCE DECD THROUGH LRS AND ORS

IA/15681/2024 · 2026-08-28

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Megha 25_ia_15681_2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15681 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO.30376 OF 2017 Gajanan S. Patil since deceased through LRs 1. Surekha Gajanan Patil and Ors. ...Applicants/Appellants V/s. Dattatray Sukur Patil since deceased through is heirs & legal representatives i.e. Respondent No.2, 3 and 4, 1a. Chaya Dattatraya Patil and Ors. ...Respondents ________________ Ms. Anu C. Kaladharan h/f. Mrs. Anjali N. Helekar for the Applicants/Appellants. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 28 AUGUST 2026. P.C.: 1) The Application is filed for bringing on record the legal heirs of the deceased Appellant. There is delay of 880 days in filing the Application. This Court has issued notices to the Respondents in the Application. Notices are duly served on Respondent Nos.1A and 2 to 6. However, none has appeared on behalf of the Respondents. Page No. 1 of 2 28 August 2026 026:BHC-AS:1 Megha 25_ia_15681_2024 2) Considering the reasons pleaded in the Application and for the purpose of granting an opportunity to the legal heirs of the Appellant to prosecute the Appeal on merits, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay in filing the Application. 3) Accordingly, delay in filing the Application is condoned. Legal heirs of the deceased Appellant are permitted to be brought on record. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 4) The Interim Application is accordingly disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 28 August 2026 Signed by: Megha S. Parab Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 29/08/2026 17:55:38