Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
!"#
&
(
learned Additio 12.11.2024, un Police Station
%" ("
"!
!+ ! ,! !+!#!
+,
"#$"%" &' ( * -
! #!
.... () * etition under Section 483( seeks cancellation of regular bai dditional Chief Judicial Magistrate, H , under Sections 85 and 316(2) of ation Sadar, District Hoshiarpur.
!" #! !
"
!
"&#'
" !
!#
" *
" + &! ,! !
"" !*+
"
##
--../01-1234 %5 "&*/*1 6 " 6
7 "%" ( ( !
483(3) /
+
,
(
lar bail allowed to respondent No. 2 by trate, Hoshiarpur in FIR No. 203, dated 2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ! $
!
"
(
)!
""!* ! !"+
+# &! -("
"
""!*
! ,! #
" ! ( "
(
o. 2 by , dated , 2023, * #! ! ( KAPIL 2026.04.23 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
--../0
!" 01 !"* 2 3 *
( ! 5 % -
" * * )!
6 &#'
" ./01-1234
! + *
+ !#
##
1!&+1 )!
! ! 34-,!
2 ! !$"
!#! (
!+
"*
-!,!
*
*
+ "
6
!#!
"
(
)!
;
"
<
* !$"
!$$!!#!## /, !!* % (
+! ! "
" ! !
"
<
!!#&
""
## "!($ ( 4!!!# +
( -
!# 1+
#"+"
!7% 89 :!#/,
(
!,! *!#" &! "!
#"
"
!#!(" !
" &# '
"
(
%!#"
! 0 *! !!
! !!
#!
" !7% 89
" !+ !"#! !$"
! !
! "
!
"!* !+ "!(
! "!!#
"* !
!
! # !!#"!*""
<
"
#! -2- !#
/, #" ("
!
" !# #! 89 :
(
"*"" !+ "" #!
KAPIL 2026.04.23 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
--../0 % In Sanjay Kumar Another, Hon’b ; ./01-1234 # ! &!>
""!*
"
"
"
<
! ! #( !#
" *!+" ! "
!+ * &!!
#!
(
! !
$ /
" !
+
*-$
In Crl. Appeal No. 2381 of 2025 umar Jangid and Another Vs. M Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed ;8 ! !2 =9 :!#&&+ !" !
""
( $
#
" !
""!*
(
" (!#!
! !
"+"
+!* - >"+ 4 $
!
"
!
!"
!
" " ! $ !# - %
"
$!*
( *! ! $! !# !!
+
! * ! ! + ! ! #
<34- f 2025, decided on 02.05.2025, titled s. Mukesh Kumar Aggarwal an served as follows !(
""
! !#
" + "
!
"! (
$
" $
"
!"!( ! ! !+ ! ! !# #!
""
!!#
"
""
" (!!*
"
-3- ! <0 (! # !# titled l and
+ ! #
"
KAPIL 2026.04.23 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
--../0
9 * #" (! (
" ! ! - 8 4 !# ! * # $$ $$ * 0# ,$ ./01-1234 ""*9:
$ $"
$
"
+ 9: (
! 9:
$!
$ 9:
* ! *!"
$$!!(
#"(!
! !+9:
(!( (! ! !$( ( + 9:
$ ! "
+ (!
""
"! !
!($ !
##"
#!$
!$
!!
!
"
$! -
$
6@
!#)
+ 4
"! "
" ! !
" $ ! # #!
!
"
!!#$!$
$$ %%&!'# $$ ,& - ( &&-. (# #/ $ &' - $"++"(( : # * ! !
$ * ! * "( $"
* (
!9:" "!!!# :
$!$
$"#
(
"
" ! (
$"# +!
!# ""
!C
4 ($
!!#
"
!
""
!!#
"*
#*"+!# !"("+!! ?9%:1!" +
9==%:&& 2=:AB !
! ! # ""(
"
"#
!9- )
#(
) * + . ) + / ) 0 #)
1 2#) 3-$ -4- ( !# !# + ( # 4
!#
1!"
" ! # + KAPIL 2026.04.23 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
--../0
7. The p concession of compelling just
8. Th Court of Magis the application 10 days. It is no articles has not entrusted to the rightly noticed Relevant facts Hoshiarpur, wh that the discreti of accusation. amenable to in that after relea manner. This C to be curtailed $+
9. Pe
*/*1 D
"
./01-1234 The principal of law well establishe on of liberty once granted is not to ng justification there for. The case under Sections 85, 316 Magistrate and was punishable with cation for regular bail was allowed, res t is not the law that regular bail is to as not been effected. Whether or not to the petitioner is a matter of trial oticed in the impugned order that cour facts have been duly taken into co , while considering the prayer for re iscretion has been wrongly or arbitrar ation.
Order of learned ACJM, Ho interference particularly, when it r release on bail, respondent No.2 his Court is not of the opinion that tailed by cancelling the order of regu +$ Pending CRM(s), if any, are also d 2 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - blished by a line of precedents is tha not to be withdrawn unless there i 5, 316(2) of BNS was triable by th imprisonment upto 3 years. When espondent No.2 was in custody fo l is to be declined if recovery of dowry or not the dowry articles were indeed al. Learned ACJM, Hoshiarpur, ha at court cannot act as a recovery agent into consideration by learned ACJM r for regular bail and it does not appea rbitrarily exercised, ignoring the natur M, Hoshiarpur is reasoned one, no hen it is not the stand of the petitione No.2 misused the concession in any that liberty of respondent No.2 need f regular bail. !# also disposed of accordingly. ( ( : Yes/No : Yes/No
-5- is that here is by the When for dowry indeed has agent. ACJM, appear nature ne, not titioner in any 2 needs #!#
(4 KAPIL 2026.04.23 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document