IN TH 210 Surender P Chandra S Court, Sec CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate Be Pal Singh v the petition counsel for the respon 12.12.2024 concerned the authori COCP-5697-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.5697 o Date of decision nder Pal Singh Versus ndra Shekhar, Registrar General, P rt, Sector -1, Chandigarh and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G for respondent No.3. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 22.5.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-1406 ingh vs. Punjab and Haryana High C etition was disposed of on the basis of sel for the respondents to the effect th spondents submits that in case, 2024 (Annexure P-16) has been re ned authorities and the same is still thorities concerned, the same will b 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5697 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-26.02.2026 …..Petitioner ral, Punjab and Haryana High others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate dl. A.G., Haryana ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 14061-2025 titled as “Surender igh Court and others”, whereby asis of statement made by learned fect that “….Learned counsel for ase, the representation dated n received in the office of the still pending consideration with ill be decided by the competent VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document authority w receipt of speaking o found that the same petitioner i of the sai reasons wi in the spea the petition respondent delayed pa earned leav In support copy of cor District & same is tak learned cou since the nothing sur disposed of COCP-5697-2025 (O & M) ity within a period of six weeks w t of certified copy of this order b ng order. Learned counsel further that petitioner is entitled for the be me will be granted. Even, in ca ner is proved then his claim for inte said leave encashment be also s will be mentioned for not accepting speaking order to be passed, which r itioner for his information and neces At the very outset, learne ndents No.1 and 2 submits that intere ed payment of leave encashment o ed leave has already been drawn and pport of the said submission, learned of correspondence dated 04.02.2026 i ict & Sessions Judge, Rewari, deta is taken on record. Copy of the aforesaid corre ed counsel for the petitioner, who, upo the Writ Court order dated 22.05.202 ing survives in the present contempt pe sed of. 2 ks weeks from the date of the er by passing an appropriate ther submits that in case, it is e benefit of leave encashment, case, the entitlement of the interest on the delayed release lso considered, otherwise due pting the claim of the petitioner ich reasons will be conveyed to ecessary action…..” learned counsel appearing for t interest @6% per annum on the ent of 300 days of unutilized n and disbursed to the petitioner. arned counsel has handed over a .2026 issued by respondent No.2– , detailing the compliance. The correspondence is supplied to o, upon instructions, submits that 05.2025 has been complied with, mpt petition and the same may be VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document by learned the presen of. of. February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-5697-2025 (O & M) In view of the facts noted abo arned counsel for the petitioner, no c resent contempt petition. Accordingly, the present con Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any uary 26, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 above and the statement made r, no cause of action survives in nt contempt petition is disposed if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document