Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010103772022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1307/2024
SYEDUR RAHMAN S/O LATE MAMIRUDDIN AHMED
RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SALBARI PO AND REVENUE CIRCLE BOITAMARI PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ) BONGAIGAON ASSAM
2:THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER NF RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI 11
3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND D.M. DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI ------------ Advocate for : MR. M A SHEIKH Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSSAM AND ANR.
Page No.# 2/3 Main Case : LA.App./7/2022
SYEDUR RAHMAN S/O LATE MAMIRUDDIN AHMED, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SALBARI, PO AND REVENUE CIRCLE BOITAMARI, PS ABHAYAPURI, DIST BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSSAM AND ANR.
REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR (DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ) BONGAIGAON, ASSAM
2:THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER NF RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATI 11
3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE AND D.M. DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHAT
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, MS F INTAZ,MR M H CHOUDHURY,K U AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. K GOGOI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER Date - 13.05.2026
1. Heard Mr. M. A. Sheikh, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. R. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 as well as Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent No.2.
Page No.# 3/3
2. The learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that after going through the contention of the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No.1, the present applicant is not inclined to press this Interlocutory Application, as he has already received his share of the compensation awarded to him and it is not less as stated in the instant Interlocutory Application.
3. This Interlocutory Application is, accordingly, closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant