SANJEEV LAXMINARAYAN UPADHYAY AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. GOVT PLEADER AND
WP/14005/2024 · 2026-08-18
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2150 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2150 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
60-WP-14005-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14005 OF 2024 Sanjeev Laxminarayan Upadhyay & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra Through Govt. Pleader
...Respondent Mr. Ashish Dubey for the Petitioners. Mr. Kedar B. Dighe, Addl.G.P a/w Smt.Savina R. Crasto, A.G.P for the Respondent-State. Ms. Manisha Jagtap a/w Ms. Yashashree Raut & Mr. Om Pote for the Respondent – MHADA.
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK & SANDESH D. PATIL JJ.
DATE : 18
th AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :
1.
Learned Counsel for the Respondent – MHADA submitted that after hearing all concerned, it has been found that the structure in question is unauthorized. In such view of the matter, MHADA now has to take appropriate action for demolition of the said structure. Wakodikar 1/2 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Digitally signed by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2026.08.19 11:32:38 +0530
60-WP-14005-2024.doc The MHADA may take appropriate action expeditiously as stipulated in the order dated 23rd July, 2026 which is placed on record.
2. Since the order has been passed, nothing survives for further consideration in the petition.
3. Petition is disposed of accordingly.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) Wakodikar 2/2