Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2149 (CAL)

SUPARNA SIKDAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/16783/2024 · 2026-06-18

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

252 1188..0066..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 16783 of 2024 Suparna Sikdar Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Atanu Biswas Mr. Mrinal Saha …for the respondent nos. 7 & 9 1. At the time of call no one appears for the petitioner and no accommodation is prayed for. 2. However, respondent nos. 7 and 9 are represented by learned advocate. 3. On perusal of record it appears that on 7th August, 2025 before a coordinate bench accommodation was prayed for on behalf of the petitioner and same was allowed. 4. It appears petitioner has lost interest. 5. Writ petition stands dismissed for default. 6. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)