RA-CR-126 106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ram Mehar now deceased through LRs and others The Senior Manager, HSIIDC and others CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. 12.08.2024 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court. 2. 28.10.2024, but no reply has been filed by the respondents yet. 3. through the paper 4. 126-2024 in CR-4544-2024 [ IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RA CR Date of Decision: 05.03.2026 Ram Mehar now deceased through LRs and others Versus The Senior Manager, HSIIDC and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mrs.Anita Balyan, Advocate for the applicants/ petitioners Ms. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate for the respondents. --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) This is an application for review of the order dated 12.08.2024 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court. Notice of the review application was issued on 28.10.2024, but no reply has been filed by the respondents yet. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book. In the humble opinion of this Court, no merit can be found [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR-126-2024 IN CR-4544-2024 Date of Decision: 05.03.2026 Ram Mehar now deceased through LRs and others …….Petitioners Versus The Senior Manager, HSIIDC and others ..….Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Anita Balyan, Advocate applicants/ petitioners. s. Surbhi Rana, Advocate for Mr. Pritam Singh Saini, Advocate This is an application for review of the order dated 12.08.2024 passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court. Notice of the review application was issued on 28.10.2024, but no reply has been filed by the respondents yet. counsel for the parties and gone In the humble opinion of this Court, no merit can be found This is an application for review of the order dated Notice of the review application was issued on counsel for the parties and gone In the humble opinion of this Court, no merit can be found SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.06 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA-CR-126 in the review application preferred at the instance of applicants/ petitioners. The recovery orders have been passed against the petitioners/ landowners in terms of the adjudication made by this Court vide decision dated 06.11.2015 passed in titled as value assessed by the learned Reference Court was altered; further the decision dated 06.11.2015 was upheld by the vide its order of 2017, 5. applicants/ petitioner the learned Reference Court which stood re no merit can be found in the present review application with respect to the recoveries being ordered/ effected from the applicants/ petitioners/ land 6. 7. disposed of. 05.03.2026 sanjay 126-2024 in CR-4544-2024 [ in the review application preferred at the instance of applicants/ petitioners. The recovery orders have been passed against the ners/ landowners in terms of the adjudication made by this Court vide decision dated 06.11.2015 passed in Gaje Singh Vs. State of Haryana value assessed by the learned Reference Court was altered; further cision dated 06.11.2015 was upheld by the vide its order dated 28.07.2017 passed in , titled as HSIIDC Vs. Gaje Singh and ors Once an excessive amount has been paid to the applicants/ petitioners/ landowners in terms of the award passed by the learned Reference Court which stood re no merit can be found in the present review application with respect to the recoveries being ordered/ effected from the applicants/ petitioners/ landowners regarding excess amount. Dismissed. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 05.03.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? [2] in the review application preferred at the instance of applicants/ petitioners. The recovery orders have been passed against the ners/ landowners in terms of the adjudication made by this Court vide decision dated 06.11.2015 passed in RFA-3787-2009, Gaje Singh Vs. State of Haryana, whereby the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court was altered; further cision dated 06.11.2015 was upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court passed in SLP (C) No.22453-22502 HSIIDC Vs. Gaje Singh and ors. Once an excessive amount has been paid to the owners in terms of the award passed by the learned Reference Court which stood re-assessed by this Court, no merit can be found in the present review application with respect to the recoveries being ordered/ effected from the applicants/ owners regarding excess amount. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No in the review application preferred at the instance of applicants/ petitioners. The recovery orders have been passed against the ners/ landowners in terms of the adjudication made by this 2009, , whereby the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court was altered; further Hon’ble Apex Court 22502 Once an excessive amount has been paid to the owners in terms of the award passed by assessed by this Court, no merit can be found in the present review application with respect to the recoveries being ordered/ effected from the applicants/ Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.03.06 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document