Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2138 (BOM)

M/S. NILAY ENTERPRISE v. M/S. OMKAR PUBLICITY PROMOTIONS AND ANR

WP/6888/2024 · 2026-08-18

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P-1-WP-6888-2024.DOC Rekha Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6888 OF 2024 M/s. Nilay Enterprise …Petitioner Versus M/s. Omkar Publicity Promotions and Anr. …Respondents MS. Urusah M. I. i/b Dave & Co., for the Petitioner. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 24th AUGUST, 2026. PC:- 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board. 2. The praecipe has been moved for speaking to the minutes of the Judgment dated 18th August, 2026. In paragraph No. 17, 5th line, the second sentence be corrected as follows:- “If that be so, in the facts of the present case, as noted above, the Respondent No.1, in our view, could not have invoked the provisions of MSMED Act of 2006 by making an application to the Respondent No.2 with regard to claims which were admittedly based on transactions which took place on date/dates, which were prior to the registration of the Unit as the MSME Unit under the MSMED Act of 2006.” REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Digitally signed by REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2026.08.24 18:09:10 +0530 P-1-WP-6888-2024.DOC 3. The Judgment dated 18th August, 2025 be corrected accordingly and uploaded on the website. Rest of the order remains as it is. 4. Praecipe stands disposed of. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) {