ABDUL MANNAN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR
Crl.Pet./487/2024 · 2026-04-26
Susmita Phukan Khaund
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2125 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2125 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010079692024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./487/2024 ABDUL MANNAN AND ANR S/O MAJID ALI @ ABDUL MAJID VILL- CHALANTAPARA PART-IV, P.S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM PIN-73388 2: SAIJUDDIN S/O JAMAT ULLAH VILL- CHALANTAPARA PART-IV
P.S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:ISMAIL HUSSAIN S/O GIYAS UDDIN VILL- CHALANTAPARA PART-IV
P.S. JOGIGHOPA DIST.BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, MS. B CHETIA,MS. D BORA,MR S ISLAM,MR. S. SUR,MR S H MAHMUD
Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. T BEGUM (R-2),MR. A ROSHID (R-2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 27.04.2026
1. Heard learned counsel Mr. M. U. Mahmud for the petitioners, namely (i) Abdul Mannan and (ii) Saijuddin.
2. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. B. Sharma for the respondent State and learned counsel Mr. A. Roshid for respondent No. 2, X'.
3. It is submitted that the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court. Annexure-6 is the settlement and compromise in writing wherein both the petitioners Abdul Mannan and Saijuddin, the respondent No. 2, 'X' and his wife have amicably settled their disputes.
4. The FIR was lodged by the respondent No. 2, 'X' which was registered as Jogighopa P.S. Case No. 231/2020, PRC Case No. 1223/2021 and registered under Sections 341/354/315/506/34 of the IPC. It is submitted that all the sections are compoundable except Section 354 of the IPC. This offence can be compounded by the victim.
5. It is submitted by both the sides that they have buried their hatchet and they are not willing to proceed any further. Possibility of conviction therefore appears to be remote and bleak.
6. Further proceedings will indeed be an abuse of the process of the Court.
7. Thereby, this application under Section 482 of the Cr.PC is disposed of on compromise on an amicable settlement between both the parties.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE Comparing Assistant