Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2119 (BOM)

M/S KAY KAY TRADING CO, THROUGH ITS PARTNER NISHIT KHETAN v. ZULFEEQUAR DAULATKHAN SARGUROH

APPLN/399/2024 · 2026-08-25

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

501-CRAPPLN-399-2024.ODT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 399 OF 2024 M/s. Kay Kay Trading Co., Through its Partner Nishit Khetan …Applicant Versus Zulfeequar Daulatkhan Sarguroh And Anr. …Respondents Adv. Tanmay Karmakar a/w Adv. Vaibhav Hori, for the Applicant. Senior Advocate Ashok M. Saraogi, for the Respondent No.1. Mrs. Poonam P. Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent - State. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 25TH AUGUST 2026 P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for applicant as well as learned counsel for respondent no.1 states that the parties have settled the controversy and have also executed Consent Terms dated 16th July 2026. The duly signed copy of the Consent Terms is tendered across the bar and it is taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification purpose. Both the parties submit that the undertaking mentioned in the Consent Terms be considered as undertaking submitted to the Court. 25th August 2026 501-CRAPPLN-399-2024.ODT 2. Learned counsel for applicant states that in view of the Consent Terms he wants to withdraw the instant application. 3. In view of this, the application is disposed of as withdrawn. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) VDMokal/- 25th August 2026