1 909-WP-1240-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1240 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25042 OF 2024 Mariya Kaizer Lakdawala and Another …Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Others …Respondents ****** Mr. Rahul Karnik (through VC), for the Petitioners Mr. Manish Upadhye, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and 6. Mr. Akshay Shinde, for Respondent No. 4. Ms. Anuja Tirmali i/b. Ms. Komal Punjabi, for Respondent No. 5-BMC. Mr. Ajay Vishwakarma i/b. Bushra Sayed, for Respondent Nos. 8 and 10 to 12. ****** CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. : 1. This Court had already recorded in the order dated 05/08/2026 that substantial compliance was ensured by the respondents by passing an award dated 30/07/2026. Copy of the award was taken on record on the said date. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are glaring errors in the manner in which the quantum of compensation has been calculated. We are of the opinion that if there is any Vishal Parekar ….1 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2026.08.18 18:56:27 +0530 2 909-WP-1240-2024.doc grievance in that regard, the petitioners will always be at liberty to take recourse to the avenues available in law to seek enhancement of compensation. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take such steps as available in law with regard to their grievance about the calculation of quantum of compensation in the award dated 30/07/2026. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.) Vishal Parekar ….2