IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75758 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4023 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Bharat khatri @ Bharat Indu khatri S/o Bhim Sen khatri R/o C 36/37 Mini L.I.G. Raja Ji Puram Awas, Vikas Colony, S.O. - Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh director of M/s Vincor Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. Flat no. 883, F/F PKT 3, Sector 19, Akshardham Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Govind Kumar Poddar S/o Late Deo Karan Das Poddar Partner M/S Kumar Enterprises, Ceat Compound, Exhibition Road, P.S. - Gandhi Maidan, Patna, Distt. - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gaurav Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, Advocate Ms. Aditi Hansaria, Advocate Mr. Keshav Bhardwaj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 22-06-2026 Heard Mr. Gaurav Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and Mr. Harendra Prasad, learned counsel for the State. 2. Learned counsels for the parties have submitted that the dispute between the parties has been settled outside the Court without any threat, coercion or promise and good sense has prevailed between them. It has further been submitted referring to a supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner that the settlement/agreement has been prepared and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75758 of 2024(3) dt.22-06-2026 2/2 in Paragraph-3 of the said settlement/agreement dated 18.12.2024, and as mentioned in Paragraph-5, the entire amount has been paid and the parties do not want to further litigate the matter. It has further been submitted that the dispute arises out of the commercial transactions and have jointly prayed that the proceedings pending against the petitioners may be quashed. 3. Heard the parties and perused the records. 4. The dispute primarily arises out of commercial transactions, the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court without any threat, coercion or promise. 5. Hence, in the interest of justice, the order taking cognizance dated 10.08.2023 and the revisional order dated 21.08.2024 are hereby quashed. 6. The application stands allowed. shivam/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T