MADHAV DATTARAO WAGHMARE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
WP/9441/2024 · 2026-08-24
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2111 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2111 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 1 )
2 WP 9441 OF 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 2 WRIT PETITION NO. 9441 OF 2024 MADHAV DATTARAO WAGHMARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS ... Mr. R. K. Ingole, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : 24.08.2026 PER COURT :- . On 23.09.2025, this matter was called out twice during the day. However, none appeared for the petitioner. Thereafter, the matter was posted to 07.08.2026. On that day also, nobody appeared for the petitioner. This Court therefore kept the matter for dismissal on 21.08.2026. On 21.08.2026, a request was advanced on behalf of Mr. A. D. Raut, learned Advocate to keep this matter on 24.08.2026. Accordingly, this matter was kept on 24.08.2026. In the first session, when the matter was called out nobody appeared for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was kept in the second session. In the second session also, there is no one to prosecute the writ petition. 2026:BHC-AUG:38518
( 2 )
2 WP 9441 OF 2024
2. With the able assistance of learned Advocate for Zilla Parishad and learned AGP, I have gone through the writ petition papers. The petitioner has sought disqualification of respondent No.5, who was democratically elected in the general elections to the Village Panchayat conducted in 2021. The tenure of the local body is over by now. In view of this, nothing remains in this writ petition.
3. The Writ Petition stands dismissed with cost of Rs.15,000/-. If the cost is not deposited within four weeks from today, the same shall be recovered as land revenue from the petitioner.
[AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] PRW