Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2024 DAILYLAW 209 (ORI)

M/S. DEBATA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., CUTTACK v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/26787/2024 · 2026-03-05

Chittaranjan Dash

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P(C) No. 26787 of 2024 M/s. Debata Construction Pvt. Ltd., Cuttack …. Petitioner Mr. G.M. Rath, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.B. Panda, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 05.03.2026 01. 1. By means of this application, the Petitioner seek the following relief:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) Admit the writ petition; (ii) Issue Ruie NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the correction of RoR to Khata No. 391/1421 under Annexure-6 shall not be set aside and the representation dated 21/08/2024 under Annexure-1 of the Petitioner shall be considered afresh” 2. Having regard to the fact that the dispute relates to the execution of a subsequent sale deed by the same vendor, the validity thereof cannot be questioned unless and until it is adjudicated by a competent civil court. p. 2 3. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the Petitioner may approach the appropriate civil court for adjudication of the dispute. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Sarbani Designation: Junior Stenographer