Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2071 (GAU)

Nilotpal Das and 2 Ors v. Khoda Gyati

Crl.Petn./128/2024 · 2026-04-19

Kardak Ete

Transfer Petitionbody2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040010862024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./128/2024 Nilotpal Das and 2 Ors Son of Gopal Chandra Das, C/o Director, Finsperity Limited, resident of House No. 68 L, Graham road Tollygung, Kolkata 700040 2: Mrinmoy Das Age: Occupation : Son of Subhash Chandra Das C/o Director Finsperity Limited resident of House No. 68 L Graham Road Tollygung Kolkata 700040 3: Smti Dalia Das Age: Occupation : Wife of Nilotpal Das C/o Director Finsperity Limited resident of House No. 68 L Graham Road Tollygung Kolkata 700040 VERSUS Khoda Gyati Son of Late Khoda Mudo, proprietor of M/s Amar Construction, resident of House Ni. IMC 651, Vivek Vihar, DN College Road, Itanagar, District Papumpare, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : Jyoti Zongluju, Vijay Jamoh Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : Habung Aape, T Lampung,Jambey Tsering,Lod Asha,Sumit Chhetri BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 20-04-2026 It is stated at the bar that the matter has been settled between the parties, and consequent to which a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 has been withdrawn, which has been allowed by the competent jurisdictional court. In view of the above, Ms J. Zongluju, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. H. Aape, learned counsel for the respondent have submitted that the matter may be closed on having been become infructuous. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and considering that the matter has been settled between the parties, the criminal petition stands closed on having been become infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant