Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2067 (BOM)

LALBAHADUR SARJUPRASAD VISHWAKARMA AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/1296/2024 · 2026-08-24

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

39 WP 1296-24-OS.DOC Priya Soparkar IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1296 OF 2024 Lalbahadur Sarjuprasad Vishwakarma and anr. …Petitioners Versus Union of India …Respondent Mr. Anil R. Mishra, for the Petitioners. Mr. Chetan C. Agrawal, for the Respondent. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 24th AUGUST 2026. PC:- 1. Mr. Anil R. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the Railways had subsequently issued demolition notice whereafter, the structure has also been demolished. Therefore, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Mr. Chetan C. Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent has confirmed the said submission. 3. In view of the above, The Writ Petition has become infructuous and the same is accordingly disposed of. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date: 2026.08.25 11:05:50 +0530