Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2055 (BOM)

ANITA SANJAY RANALKAR v. SANJAY PURSHOTTAM RANALKAR AND ANR

CA/6557/2024 · 2026-08-21

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 915-ca-6557-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6557 OF 2024 IN FAST/16753/2024 Anita Sanjay Ranalkar VERSUS Sanjay Purshottam Ranalkar And Anr ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kazi Rahil Riyazoddin Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Patil Prafullasing H. ... CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATED : AUGUST 21, 2026 P.C.: 1. There is a delay of 171 days caused in filing first appeal preferred in order to challenge judgment dated 27.09.2023 passed in application under Section 6 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956. 2. Having regard to the reasons mentioned in the application as also the fact that the appeal involves custody of a minor child, delay of 171 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned. The appeal be registered in accordance with law. 3. The objection with respect to the maintainability of appeal raised by learned advocate for respondents is kept open. The parties will be heard on the issue of maintainability of appeal while hearing the appeal on admission. 4. List the appeal for hearing on admission on 24.09.2026. [ROHIT W. JOSHI J.] Mujaheed//