NAVTEJ SINGH v. CYBER CELL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY GURUGRAM HARYANA AND ANR
CWP/35130/2024 · 2026-04-09
Jagmohan Bansal
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2041 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2041 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 105
CWP-35130-2024 Date of Decision: 09.04.2026
NAVTEJ SINGH
...Petitioner Vs.
CYBER CELL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND ANR. …Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Komalpreet Kaur, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate, Ms. Monika Thatai, Advocate, Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for the respondent-HDFC Bank
*** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to defreeze his bank account.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that account of petitioner stands regularized.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner expressed his inability to controvert aforesaid statement, however, seeks liberty to move appropriate application, if cause survives.
4.
Disposed of with aforesaid liberty.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE April 09, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.09 15:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document