THE PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION v. M/S ATTAPUR RICE MILLS AND OTHERS
LPA/1080/2024 · 2026-02-09
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2035 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2035 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 226 LPA-1080-2024 (O&M) Decided on : 09.02.2026 THE PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION
...Appellants Versus M/S ATTAPUR RICE MILLS AND OTHERS . . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the appellants. None for the respondents. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellants submit that the issue raised in the present appeal has already been decided by this Court while passing the
order in LPA-1957-2023- ‘The Punjab State Cooperative Supply and Marketing Fedreation Limited (MARKFED) versus M/s Jagdambe Rice Mill and others, decided on 04.11.2025’
, . Hence, the present appeal may also be disposed of in the same terms and conditions.
2. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case wherein the question of law raised has already been answered by this Court while passing the order in LPA-1957-2023- ‘M/s Jagdambe Rice Mills’s case (supra), hence, the present appeal is also disposed of in the same terms and conditions as held in LPA-1957-2023- ‘M/s Jagdambe Rice Mills’s case (supra)
,
3. Pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) JUDGE 09.02.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2026.02.11 11:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document