DAYAWATI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/4761/2024 · 2026-03-06
Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda
body2024
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2021 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2024 DAILYLAW 2021 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-4761-2024 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4761-2024 (O&M) Smt. Dayawati and another ...Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
1. Date when Order was reserved 29.01.2026
2. Date of Pronouncement of Order 06.03.2026
3. Date of uploading order 06.03.2026
4. Whether operative part or full
order is pronounced FULL
5. Delay, if any, in pronouncing of full order, and reasons thereof Not Applicable
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Mr. Ankur Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondent-HSVP. *** DEEPAK MANCHANDA
, J.
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered view that the issue involved in this case is squarely covered by the
judgment of this Court in CWP No.16389-2025, titled as “Ram Lal Mahendru Vs. State of Haryana and others”, decided on 22.12.2025, which has not been disputed by learned counsel for the State as well as respondent-HSVP.
2. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of in the same terms VANITA 2026.03.06 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and
judgment
CWP-4761-2024 (O&M) 2 as the judgment in the case of Ram Lal Mahendru (supra).
3. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA) (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE JUDGE
06.03.2026 vanita Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No VANITA 2026.03.06 14:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order and
judgment