Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010056112024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1240/2024 PAROMITA MAZUMDAR SAHA AND 2 ORS W/O SRI ALOK KUMAR SAHA, R/O FLAT NO. D-3, 2ND FLOOR, PRANABANANDA ENCLAVE, NETAJI PATH, LALGANESH, GUWAHATI-34, DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM 2: SMTI SABITA MAZUMDAR W/O SRI NITICH CH. MAZUMDER R/O FLAT NO. 401 PRASANTI PRIME APARTMENT AM ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHTI-7 KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 3: SMTI KAKOLI SAHA W/O SRI PINAK MAZUMDER R/O FLAT NO. 601 UTTARAYAN RESIDENCY NARAKASUR KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 KAMRUP METRO ASSA VERSUS SRI KHOKAN KANTI DHAR AND 3 ORS S/O LATE RAIMOHAN DHAR, R/O BARSAPARA, BILL PAR, P.O. BINOVANAGAR, P.S. FATASIL AMBARI, GUWAHATI-18, DIST. KAMRUP M, ASSAM. 2:SMTI CHANDANA DUTTA Page No.# 2/4 W/O SRI ASHOK KUMAR DUTTA R/O REHABARI BILL PAR HOUSE NO. 22 P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-08 DIST. KAMRUP R ASSAM. 3:MINTU NATH S/O LATE NALANI KANTA NATH R/O LALGANESH ODALBAKHRA LOKNATH PATH HOUSE NO. 27 P.S.FATASIL AMBARI GUWAHATI-34 DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 4:MRS. SHIBANI DHAR W/O SRI KHOKAN KANTI DHAR R/O BARSAPARA BILL PAR P.. BINOVANAGAR P.S. FATASIL AMBARI GUWAHATI-18 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D NANDI, MR. H CHAKRABORTY,MS P SARMAH,MR. A NANDI Advocate for the Respondent : , In Case : RFA/67/2015 SRI KHOKAN KANTI DHAR S/O LATE RAIMOHAN DHAR R/O BARSAPARA BILL PAR P.O. BINOVANAGAR Page No.# 3/4 P.S. FATASIL AMBARI GUWAHATI-18 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. VERSUS SMTI CHANDANA DUTTA and 2 ORS W/O SRI ASHOK KUMAR DUTTA R/O REHABARI BILL PAR HOUSE NO. 22 P.S. PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-08 DIST. KAMRUP R ASSAM. 2:MINTU NATH S/O LATE NALANI KANTA NATH R/O LALGANESH ODALBAKHRA LOKNATH PATH HOUSE NO. 27 P.S.FATASIL AMBARI GUWAHATI-34 DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM. 3:MRS. SHIBANI DHAR W/O SRI KHOKAN KANTI DHAR R/O BARSAPARA BILL PAR P.. BINOVANAGAR P.S. FATASIL AMBARI GUWAHATI-18 DIST. KAMRUP M ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR.T C DAS Advocate for : MS.P BORGOHAINR-2 appearing for SMTI CHANDANA DUTTA and 2 ORS WITH RFA Case No. 67/2015 Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 18.02.2026 [1] Heard Mr. P. Sarma, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, who submits that this appeal has become infructuous and therefore, the appellant is not intending to pursue the same. [2] Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal is dismissed on becoming infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant