Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2024 DAILYLAW 2014 (DEL)

M S K EDUCATIONS PVT LTD v. DRONA SHIKSHAN SAMITI & ORS.

CS(COMM)/576/2024 · 2026-03-13

Jyoti Singh

body2024

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 576/2024 Page 1 of 2 $~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 576/2024 & I.A. 33395/2024, 13532/2025, 13627/2025 M S K EDUCATIONS PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Aarzoo Aneja and Ms. Roopashi Aggarwal, Advocates. versus DRONA SHIKSHAN SAMITI & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. D. K. Yadav and Mr. Praful Nawani, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 13.03.2026 1. This suit is instituted on behalf of the Plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendants and all others acting on their behalf from providing, offering educational services, advertising (physical/virtual sites) or doing any other act using Plaintiff’s registered trademark BACHPAN and its formative marks and/or any mark(s) deceptively similar thereto. Injunction is also sought against copyright infringement in the artistic work in , registered under No. A-131878/2019 as also from passing off, amongst other reliefs. 2. During the pendency of the suit, parties were referred for mediation before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where they have amicably resolved their inter se disputes and executed a Settlement This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 12:31:30 CS(COMM) 576/2024 Page 2 of 2 Agreement on 11.03.2026, incorporating the terms of settlement, which inter alia include payment of sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- to the Plaintiff in three instalments of which, the first instalment for Rs. 2,00,000/- stands paid and the second and third instalments for Rs. 1,50,000/- each are payable on or before 07.04.2026 and 07.05.2026 respectively. Copy of the Settlement Agreement has been placed on record and perused by the Court. 3. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of the settlement. Needless to state, Settlement Agreement shall form a part of the decree and terms thereof will bind the parties thereto. 4. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 5. Suit is disposed of along with pending applications. 6. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870. JYOTI SINGH, J MARCH 13, 2026/VP This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 12:31:30