APHC010295082024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 9 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3002/2024 Between: 1. A BALAJI, S/O A NAGARAJ CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 8/353, KOTHAPETA, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 1. MUPPALA RAMESH BABU, COMMISSIONER, SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 2. SRI V SANJEEV KUMAR, PRESENT INCHARGE COMMISSIONER SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY SRI KALAHASTI,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 2 IS SUO MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 31/07/25 3. SRI BHAVANI PRASAD, MUNICIPAL COMMSSIONER SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY R 3 IS IMPLEADED A AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 06.11.2025 IN CC NO 2024. Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors for contempt of court for willful disobedience in violating the orders of the Hon'ble High Court C.C.No.3002 of 2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3002/2024 S/O A NAGARAJ CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 8/353, KOTHAPETA, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER AND MUPPALA RAMESH BABU, COMMISSIONER, SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. KUMAR, PRESENT INCHARGE COMMISSIONER SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY SRI KALAHASTI,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 2 IS SUO MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER SRI BHAVANI PRASAD, MUNICIPAL COMMSSIONER SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTU AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 06.11.2025 IN CC NO ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors for contempt of court for willful disobedience in violating the orders of the Hon'ble High Court RC,J C.C.No.3002 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI S/O A NAGARAJ CHETTY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 8/353, KOTHAPETA, SRIKALAHASTI, TIRUPATI ...PETITIONER MUPPALA RAMESH BABU, COMMISSIONER, SRIKALAHASTI KUMAR, PRESENT INCHARGE COMMISSIONER SRIKALAHASTI MUNICIPALITY SRI KALAHASTI,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 2 IS SUO MOTO IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER SRI BHAVANI PRASAD, MUNICIPAL COMMSSIONER S SUO MOTU AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 06.11.2025 IN CC NO-3002 OF ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors for contempt of court for willful disobedience in violating the orders of the Hon'ble High Court RC,J C.C.No.3002 of 2024 2 passed in W.P.No.9859/2024 dated 03.05.2024 under the Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act to and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the 2nd respondent as Proposed Respondent No.2 in CC No. 3002 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the 1st Respondent for further hearings, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK RAFI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 2. GUDAPATI LAKSHMI NARAYANA The Court made the following: RC,J C.C.No.3002 of 2024 3 ORDER Sri Shaik Rafi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Gudapati Lakshmi Narayana, learned counsel for respondents, submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has duly been complied with and hence nothing remains for adjudication and the same may be closed. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for parties, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 9TH September, 2026. RR