Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040011152024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/371/2024 M/s M M Project and Anr Tali complex, Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Toloka Mihu Age: Occupation : Son of Late K Mihu resident of Mayu II Roing Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 792110 Power of Attorney holder of M/s MM Project Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Secretary, Department of Urban Development and Housing, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar, 791111 2:The Chief Engineer cum Director Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Urban Development and Housing Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:The General Manager (Const) Age: 0 Occupation : Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Sector 34 Noida 201307 Uttar Pradesh. 4:The Executive Engineer Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Urban Development and Housing Roing Division Lower Dibang Valley District Roing Arunachal Pradesh 792110 5:The Deputy Director Age: 0 Occupation : Urban Development and Housing Roing Division Roing Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh 792110. 6:The Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Age: 0 Occupation : B-15 Institutional Area Sector-62 Noida Uttar Pradesh 20130 Advocate for the Petitioner : Sunil Mow, Chanya Bangsia,Tenzin Chhoten,Tado Siga,Aruna Rai,D Tatum,k N Maling,Sonam Tsomo Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), R S Choudhury,Topi Jini BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 25.03.2026 Heard Mr. S. Mow, learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5. Pursuant to the order of this Court, dated 20.03.2026, Ms. Basar has produced the compliance report and she submits that the petitioner has already received the amount and the money receipt is enclosed with the instruction, Page No.# 3/3 which she has received from the Executive Engineer, Department of Urban Affairs, Roing. Mr. Mow, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in that view of the matter, this petition may be closed; as the prayer being made in this writ petition has already been complied with. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of the learned counsel for both the parties, this writ petition stands closed. The written instruction, produced before the Court today by Ms. Basar, learned Government Advocate; shall be marked as ‘Annexure A’ and shall be tagged with the record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant